For product teams

AI meeting copilot for product teamsEvery decision becomes a ticket. Automatically.

Caspi walks into your discovery and stakeholder calls already knowing the roadmap, the open tickets and what was promised last time - then turns what you agree on into specs your engineers can actually pick up.

Free to start · Linear, Jira, GitHub, Notion · No bot joins your call

Private by design

Your meeting data is never sold and never used to train models.

No bot, ever

Runs on your own screen. Nothing joins the call, nothing for the other side to accept.

Free to start

No card required to try it on a real call.

You approve everything

Nothing is filed into your tools until you say so.

Sound familiar?

What actually goes wrong for product managers.

01

The decision was made. Nobody wrote it down.

Three weeks later the team is rebuilding a thing you explicitly agreed to cut, because the decision lived in a call nobody can find.

02

You file the same ticket twice

The customer asks for something, you create it, and it turns out engineering opened it a month ago under a different name.

03

Discovery insight dies in a doc

You take great notes on a customer call. They sit in a page nobody opens, and the roadmap gets decided on the loudest opinion instead.

How it works

One call, start to finish.

One discovery call, from the prep that reads your backlog to the tickets sitting in Linear before you've left the meeting.

Preparing your meeting
  • Read the invite: Northwind - Bulk import discovery

  • Searched your memory - 2 earlier conversations

  • Linear - 4 items

  • Notion - 2 items

  • Slack - 6 items

01Before

It reads your backlog, not just your calendar

Caspi pulls the open Linear and Jira issues, the relevant Notion pages and what this customer said last time, then tells you what's still unresolved before you join.

Reading what's on screen

Duration is identical across all failed jobs regardless of row count, which indicates a fixed request timeout rather than a volume ceiling.

Every failure is a timeout at exactly 30s - not a row-count limit.

It's the timeout, not the volume. Reframe the ask around retries.

02On screen

It reads the log they just shared

The customer shares an error export. Caspi finds the pattern in the background: every failure stops at exactly 30 seconds regardless of row count - a timeout, not the volume limit everyone assumed.

Ask anything, mid-call

Do we already have a ticket for this?

Yes - GAR-142, open 5 weeks, linked to two other accounts. Mapping is GAR-118, closed.

03Mid-call

“Do we already have a ticket for this?”

Ask without leaving the call and Caspi checks Linear, Jira and GitHub - so you attach evidence to the issue that exists instead of opening the same one twice.

Follow-up email

Drafted and ready to send

Subject

Northwind bulk import - what we found

04After

Tickets and specs, not a summary

Caspi drafts agent-ready specs for Linear, Jira or GitHub and the decision log for Notion - each checked against what already exists before anything is created.

Filed - not just drafted

LINEAR

GAR-142: add evidence - 30s timeout, 40k rows, 2×/week

Done

NOTION

Discovery: Northwind bulk import - decision log

Done
05Filed

It extends the ticket instead of duplicating it

The evidence attaches to the Linear issue that already existed, and the decision log appears in Notion. You approve each one, and anything already covered is shown to you rather than created again.

In the room, you're tracking the decision - not the notes

Caspi runs on your screen, stays out of the screen share, and puts no bot in the participant list. Your customer is talking to you, not to a recording tool.

  • A running record of what was decided versus merely discussed
  • The follow-up question that closes an open loop
  • Read a dashboard or spec the other side shares on screen
  • Every commitment and date, captured as it's said
Zeroduplicate tickets filed from calls
Agent-readyspecs your engineers can pick up as-is
Searchablerecord of every decision you've ever made

It writes into what you already use. Nothing to migrate, no new place to check.

linear logojira logogithub logonotion logofigma logoslack logo

Product questions, answered

The things product managers ask before they install it.

A ticket written with enough context that a coding agent (or a new engineer) can start without asking three follow-up questions: the problem, the constraint that came out of the call, the acceptance criteria, and links to the related issues Caspi found.

Before proposing new work, Caspi searches your connected Linear, Jira, GitHub and Notion for anything covering the same topic. Matches appear under Already covered, so you extend the existing issue instead of opening a second one.

On Pro, you can pin specific GitHub repositories so Caspi reads them for context during prep and when drafting specs. It only ever reads what you connect.

No. Every ticket, doc and message is proposed as a draft. Nothing reaches Linear, Jira or Notion until you review and confirm it.

Other teams

Caspi for the rest of your company.

Your next product call could run itself.

Free to start on macOS or Windows (preview). No bot joins your meeting, and every call makes the next one sharper.

Download for WindowsDownload free

macOS 13+ · Windows (preview)